Norway and the Winter Olympics

Norway said no to arrange the Winter Olympics in 2022.


There are several and somewhat complicated reasons for this decision. I will try to clarify.

  • Values
  • Culture
  • Politics


Let us start with the basics: The Oath for the athletes and the Olympic Charter which gives the IOC their mandate.

First, the Olympic Oath:

In the name of all the competitors I promise that we shall take part in these Olympic Games, respecting and abiding by the rules which govern them, committing ourselves to a sport without doping and without drugs, in the true spirit of sportsmanship, for the glory of sport and the honor of our teams[

Then parts of the Olympic Charter:

To promote a positive legacy from the Olympic Games to the host cities and host countries; To encourage and support initiatives blending sport with culture and education

To see the whole International Olympic Committee Charter, click here.

The IOC has a document, 7000 pages, with requirements to the arranging city. Admittedly, most of these are of a technical character, but then they present these demands:

  • A cocktail party with the King, paid by the King.
  • A special lane on all roads to the Olympic sites, solely for the members of the IOC, and the traffic lights should have a “green passage” for the IOC limousines.
  • A special reception (no passport control, customs etc.) at their arrival in Oslo; directly into a waiting limousine.
  • Food of high quality available at all times and places, and of course alcohol.
  • Physicians to be available, that is, with them, at all times.
  • The bars at their five + stars hotels to stay open longer than the Norwegian law allows.

There are several more, but let us take these now.

These demands collide heavily with the basic values of the Norwegian people.

Our basic value is equality; no person is better than others. People with a lot of money or power or both cannot throw their weight around without reactions from their community. An ostentatious display of money or power will be met by disgust, and if anybody oversteps the civic or legal boundaries, the punishment is harsh.

And here comes these members of the IOC and demand a cocktail party with our King, paid by the King……….. Nobody invites themselves to our King. The King invites, so who do these people think they are???

When you read the list of demands, it seems that they look upon themselves as kings or presidents, and demand to be treated as such. And, just as a reminder, they are in charge of arranging a sport event, the Winter Olympics.

We Norwegians were stunned. We could hardly believe what we read.


Our values and culture are of course closely connected, but I will write something about how these values are implemented in the Norwegian people.

Norway is a fairly large country, area wise, at least in Europe. But our topography is very special. Deep long fjords, high mountains and thousands of islands and very harsh weather conditions have developed a country of very small communities spread over long distances.

If you check all the champion athletes of Norway through the ages, it is quite consistent that most of them come from small places. The reason is very simple. Growing up in these small villages, what is there to do in your free time as a child or teenager? The main answer: Sports, especially winter sports. One reason for that is that all it takes is snow and a pair of skies. Most small places don’t have facilities like a stadium or an ice hockey hall.

So, here comes the culture part. How are these small sports clubs organized? Simple: Volunteers. Not specifically Norwegian, but what is special for Norway is that there are so many of them and the villages, we call them just places, are so very small.

We are only just five million people spread over a large and tough country and there are thousands of volunteers taking care of our youngsters and creating great athletes.

Norway is a very rich country, but despite that, we have not been able to build enough infrastructure to meet the requirements of all the small places. There is a need for swimming halls, ice hockey halls, indoor football halls, track and field facilities and so forth.

So, why should Norway arrange a Winter Olympics, using billions of kroner on a trumped up event, lasting for some weeks, organized by a body of old men living in a dream bubble, their history of budget breaches and corruption………and in the end; the infrastructure stays in Oslo, leaving all the small places with nothing.

The unison answer was NO.

When that “NO” hit the IOC, they sent out a press release the same day. They accused Norwegian politicians and our people to be ignorant and had not understood the process. It was very defensive and condescending.


There were originally nine applicants for the arrangement of the winter Olympics in 2022.

Ukraine (Lviv), Germany (München), Switzerland (St. Moritz and Davos), Poland (Krakow), Sweden (Stockholm), Norway (Oslo), Kasakhstan (Almaty) and China (Beijing).

München, St. Moritz and Davos all said no after referendums.

So, then the IOC were left with seven. Lviv had to say no of obvious reasons, then Stockholm and Krakow declined and they were left with three: Oslo, Almaty and Beijing.

So, all the democratic countries have now said no. The IOC is left with two authoritarian states with a history of serious violation of human rights. If that does not worry them, they really have to rethink the focus and process of finding proper cities to arrange the Winter Olympics.


Norway said no because:

  • The Norwegian people said no.
  • A majority of people involved in sports, both professionals and volunteers, said no.
  • The Olympics has developed into a blown up, commercialized event, removed from the Olympic spirit, and managed by a bunch of old men living in a feudal world so removed from what the Olympics are about: “the true spirit of sportsmanship” that all the democratic nations said no.
  • The Norwegian politicians, in respect of the will of the Norwegian people, said no.
  • Some of the demands, quoted here, that the IOC presented to Norway, are so rude and ridiculous that they alone could induce a loud and clear NO from the Norwegian people.
  • The angry and condescending response from the IOC is a clear confirmation that our NO was right.
  • We can use all the billions earmarked for the Olympics to start a major project to improve the infrastructure for sports across all the small places of Norway… (Free quote of the Norwegian Prime Minister).

Our no is a clear danger sign for IOC. If they have any sense, they must realize that the overwhelming cost, the enormous budget breaches, the pompous behaviour of the IOC and the negative response from solid economies like Germany, Switzerland, Sweden and Norway is a clear message: Distrust.

They are now left with two authoritarian countries with serious human right issues. What does that tell them? Publicly they refuse to admit that this is a problem. If that is real, then they are really in trouble…….

If they don’t do something about the organization, cost level and the demands to the arraigning cities, AND refocus on what the Olympics is about, SPORTS, we can see the end of Winter Olympics.


Healthcare System in the US

So now the law passed. A big step for Obama and a tiny step for the American people.

On the one hand, this is a complicated issue. On the other; a very simple one.

We can approach it from different angles:

  • Legal
  • Political
  • Economical
  • Social

Well, this was the legal part of it. But still, if you only look at the Law, why did four of the five Republican members of the Supreme Court vote against it? That is politics. The Supreme Court of the US has become a political vehicle in the power game, and that is very unhealthy.

Democracy is based on the principal that you divide the Power of the State in three: The lawmakers (the Parliament/Congress), the implementers of the Parliament (the Government) and the Law, with the ultimate decision maker: the Supreme Court. BUT, they stick to the LAWS of the country.

In the US, this principal is merged into a gordian knot that nobody seems able to cut through. It is a horrible mix of lobbyism, political money to several layers of candidates, including the Presidency and because of the two party system, it is so polarized that all kinds of extremist are forced into one of the two parties. Does this sound like a healthy political system? No, it does not, and it is not.

Let’s move to the economy of this. I can dazzle you with all kind of numbers about the cost of the war(s) and the cost of medical care in the US. What do we know? We know that: The United States of America, the Super Power of the world, CANNOT AFFORD THESE WARS.

President Bush sent the US into one of the most unfounded (I would prefer unnecessary and stupid), war in the history of mankind, based on some flimsy satellite pictures. On top of the enormous loss of lives in Iraq, USA definitely could not afford this war. The economy suffered greatly and the US State had a double deficit: The budget (they used more money than they had) and the international trade (they bought more from other countries than were sold to them). A dangerous situation, also internationally.

At the same time, the Americans use the equivalent of 18.2 % of their GDP on medical care (Source: Article in September 12, 2011 National Coalition on Health Care)

Compared to other western countries, who use 9-12 %. The difference is that those countries give free medical care to ALL their citizens, whether you are a bus driver or the CEO of a major bank.

I can hear the scream across the Atlantic: SOCIALISM!!! The government paying for our health care??? No way, man!

Well, it is THE ONLY WAY out of the mess that the US is in now. If the US cling to a basically privatized health care system, and is prized as such, untreated sick patients, premature deaths will grow, and, from a cynical point of view, the productivity will decrease.

So, where are we? The Social Aspect of life………...

In short, “we” the basic Western World do not understand why the United States of America, Super Power, cannot take care of its own citizens. 46.2 million are without health insurance, 15.25 of the American people are below the UN’s standard off Poverty (United States Census), the US is at the ultimate bottom of the illiteracy in the western world. And I could go on, and on…….

What we do NOT understand, is that this supposedly Super Power, is NOT able to take care of their own citizens. — An American said to me that people had to deserve health care……

Well, DESERVE?? Let us think of a person that is laid off because his/her company goes bankrupt caused by the dwindling economy. The person had medical insurance through the job, but is now without a job and without health care. Does he or she deserve health care?? – Of course, but that is not the case in USA.

So, to the heart of the matter: Do the American people really accept that people can and will be sick and die because they cannot afford some kind of medical insurance?